• You are here:
  • News & Events
  • News
  • Legal Ethics Committee Adopts New Opinion on Disclosing Client Information
  • Print Page

Legal Ethics Committee Adopts New Opinion on Disclosing Client Information

May 09, 2022

In April 2022, the Legal Ethics Committee issued Opinion 383 finding that, absent informed consent, a lawyer generally may not disclose to a client or prospective client information about another client or prospective client that is a protected secret or confidence under Rules 1.6 or 1.18. Such protected information often includes (1) the identity of another client or prospective client and (2) the nature of the other person’s matter. LEO 383 cautions that even requesting or agreeing to a commitment to make such disclosures pursuant to an outside counsel agreement or otherwise may constitute a prohibited attempt or inducement to another to violate the Rules. The opinion also concludes that Rules 1.7(d) and 1.16 — and not an advance agreement between one client and outside counsel — govern whether a lawyer must or may withdraw from her representation of another client if a “midstream” conflict arises. Finally, a lawyer may not permit a client to access the lawyer’s records if such access might disclose confidences or secrets of other clients. Read the full opinion here.

Recent News

Gavel and judge's hands

March 16, 2026

Litigator Juanita Ferguson Appointed to CJDT

On March 11, Juanita F. Ferguson was sworn in as the newest member of the District of Columbia Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure (CJDT), replacing William Lightfoot, who served for 25 years.

Comment on Fitness of 13 Applicants for Superior Court Vacancy

March 16, 2026

Comment on Fitness of 13 Applicants for Superior Court Vacancy

On March 12 the District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission announced that there are 13 applicants for the pending judicial vacancy on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia created by the resignation of Judge Maurice A. Ross.

Skyline