• You are here:
  • News & Events
  • News
  • Court of Appeals Amends Rules Regarding Access to Electronic Information, Prosecutorial Disclosure,
  • Print Page

Court of Appeals Amends Rules Regarding Access to Electronic Information, Prosecutorial Disclosure, and Oversight of Nonlawyer Assistants

April 14, 2025

By Jeremy Conrad

On April 7 the District of Columbia Court of Appeals announced amendments to D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (Competence), 1.6 (Confidentiality of Information), 3.8 (Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor), 4.4 (Respect for Rights of Third Persons), and 5.3 (Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants).

The amendments involve a wide range of duties and responsibilities of lawyers. Changes to Rule 1.1 address a lawyer’s continuing responsibility to keep abreast of changes in technology and the steps that a lawyer must take when contracting with a lawyer who is not associated with their firm.

Amendments to Rule 1.6 address a lawyer’s duty to exercise reasonable care to prevent unauthorized access to electronic information. The court made amendments to subsection (f) as well as Comment [40].

Amendments to Rule 3.8 ensure consistency with the Court of Appeals’ holding in In re Kline and include new Rules 3.8(h), (i), and (j) as well as Comments [4]–[7] regarding the duties of prosecutors to disclose certain post-conviction exculpatory information. Changes to Rule 5.3 address ethical obligations when lawyers outsource legal work or use “outside” lawyers, and when the client rather than the lawyer is directing the outsourcing.

The court deleted the words “upon request” from Rule 3.8(d), added language relating to impeachment and information tending to support a motion to suppress evidence in Rule 3.8(e), and adjusted language regarding prosecutorial constitutional and ethical responsibilities surrounding disclosure.

For consistency, the court changed “is aware” in Rule 3.8(i) to “knows.” This change addresses the inconsistent use of terminology in subsections (h) and (i).

The introduction of new Rule 3.8(h)(3) addresses the fact that in the District of Columbia there are two different “chief prosecutors” — the United States Attorney’s Office (USAO) and the D.C. Office of the Attorney General (OAG). Amendments to Rules 3.8(h)(2) and (i) also incorporate similar language, avoiding the imposition of duties on OAG attorneys to attempt to remedy a conviction in a case prosecuted by the USAO, and vice versa.

Rule 4.4 initially imposed an obligation to return inadvertently transmitted communications sent to “an adversary.” Under the revised rule, the obligation now applies whenever information is inadvertently transmitted to “another lawyer.” The court added Rule 4.4(c) to address the obligations of an attorney who begins reading a writing without knowing that it is subject to the rule and determines the rule’s applicability while reading. The court also provided further guidance on these issues in changes to Comments [2]–[4].
 
Finally, the court added two comments to Rule 5.3. With the addition of Comments [3] and [4], the court has provided guidance to lawyers on the responsibilities they have when contracting with nonlawyers who are not associated with their firm.

The full text of the court’s order implementing these changes, including both clean and redline versions of the rules as amended, can be found here. The amendments will go into effect on May 6, 2025.

Recent News

Shaun Snyder

May 05, 2025

Candidates Pitch Vision for the Bar at Member Reception

By Jeremy Conrad

On May 1 D.C. Bar President Shaun Snyder addressed more than 100 members at a reception and lauded many of the Bar’s programs, services, and leadership opportunities, emphasizing the value of relationships he has forged through his involvement with the Bar.

D.C. Superior Court Chief Judge Milton C. Lee Jr.

April 30, 2025

AI and the Courts: Conference Highlights Dangers of New Tech

By Jeremy Conrad

Discussions at the 2025 Judicial & Bar Conference on April 25 reflected on the impact of technological changes on the legal profession, but several panelists also drew attention to the potential harm of artificial intelligence on the orderly administration of justice.

2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

April 30, 2025

D.C. Courts Release 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

Chief Judge Anna Blackburne-Rigsby of the D.C. Court of Appeals and Chief Judge Milton C. Lee, Jr., of the D.C. Superior Court have released the 14th annual Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll, recognizing the contributions of those D.C. Bar members and other lawyers authorized to perform pro bono legal work in the District of Columbia who completed 50 hours or more of pro bono service during the prior calendar year.

Skyline