• You are here:
  • News & Events
  • News
  • Superior Court Allows Ayuda Employees to Provide Pro Bono Services
  • Print Page

Superior Court Allows Ayuda Employees to Provide Pro Bono Services

September 02, 2021

The Superior Court of the District of Columbia issued Administrative Order 21-10 on September 1, authorizing Ayuda employees who are not members of the District of Columbia Bar to provide pro bono and low bono legal services in the court’s Family Court, Domestic Violence Division, and Small Claims and Conciliation Branch within the Civil Division.

Ayuda employees are authorized to practice under the order provided they are a member in good standing of the bar of another jurisdiction or a graduate of an ABA-accredited law school who has taken the bar examination and has been certified as being “of good character and legal ability.” The employees must be supervised by an enrolled, active member of the D.C. Bar employed by Ayuda.

Established in 1973, Ayuda provides legal, social, and language services to low-income immigrants in the Washington, D.C., metro area.

 

Recent News

Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains

September 07, 2021

Cryptocurrency Expert Offers Background on Regulation of New Financial Offerings

By Jeremy Conrad

To help attorneys advance their understanding of cryptocurrency and new financial offerings that are changing the investment world, the D.C. Bar recently hosted a CLE course by Eric L. Guthrie, director of training programs for the Government Blockchain Association and author of the award-winning book Blockchain or Die: Learn to Profit From Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains.

D.C. Superior Court

September 02, 2021

Superior Court Issues Order Regarding Access to Juvenile Records

On September 1 the Superior Court of the District of Columbia issued Administrative Order 21-11 authorizing the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (CJCC) to inspect, compile, and analyze data regarding programming provided by the Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services.

International Law

September 01, 2021

International Law Experts Discuss Implications of Nestlé Decision

By William Roberts

The Washington Foreign Law Society hosted in late August an online forum on the U.S. Supreme Court’s June ruling in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe, consolidated with Cargill, Inc. v. Doe, which held that the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) does not support claims against U.S. corporations based on allegations of child slavery in foreign lands.

Skyline