• You are here:
  • News & Events
  • News
  • Superior Court Issues Order Regarding Evaluation of Juvenile Restorative Justice Program
  • Print Page

Superior Court Issues Order Regarding Evaluation of Juvenile Restorative Justice Program

March 05, 2021

On March 4, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia issued Administrative Order 21-01 authorizing the Office of the Attorney General of the District of Columbia (OAG) to share only de-identified case records and law enforcement records of juveniles in the delinquency system for the purposes of evaluating its restorative justice prosecution program.

The order permits access to the records by Professor Miguel de Figueiredo of the University of Connecticut School of Law and Associate Professor Dane Thorley of Brigham Young University Law, who have been tapped by OAG to study the impact and efficacy of its restorative justice prosecution program.

The order further permits OAG to publish aggregate-level, de-identified data and allows such data to be shared with the institutional review boards from the professors’ respective universities.

Recent News

Vote in the D.C. Bar Election

May 07, 2025

President-Elect Candidates Bondi, Seltzer Face Off in Virtual Forum

By Jeremy Conrad

On May 5 more than 140 people tuned in to the D.C. Bar’s virtual candidate forum for an opportunity to hear from president-elect candidates Brad Bondi and Diane Seltzer about their respective priorities if given the chance to lead the Bar.

Shaun Snyder

May 05, 2025

Candidates Pitch Vision for the Bar at Member Reception

By Jeremy Conrad

On May 1 D.C. Bar President Shaun Snyder addressed more than 100 members at a reception and lauded many of the Bar’s programs, services, and leadership opportunities, emphasizing the value of relationships he has forged through his involvement with the Bar.

D.C. Superior Court Chief Judge Milton C. Lee Jr.

April 30, 2025

AI and the Courts: Conference Highlights Dangers of New Tech

By Jeremy Conrad

Discussions at the 2025 Judicial & Bar Conference on April 25 reflected on the impact of technological changes on the legal profession, but several panelists also drew attention to the potential harm of artificial intelligence on the orderly administration of justice.

Skyline