• Print Page

Legal Ethics Committee Adopts New Opinions

February 24, 2021

The D.C. Bar Legal Ethics Committee has issued Opinion 380 (Conflict of Interest Issues Related to Witnesses), which examines certain recurring conflict of interest scenarios related to witnesses who are current or former clients, including issuing subpoenas, advising on Fifth Amendment rights, and cross-examination. The opinion also discusses thrust-upon conflicts involving unforeseen witnesses and the imputation of conflicts across a firm. Finally, the opinion offers suggestions for anticipating, identifying, preventing, and resolving conflicts related to witnesses. 

The committee has also issued Legal Ethics Opinion 381 (Responding to Third-Party Subpoena), addressing the circumstances under which a lawyer’s representation of a prospective client in responding to a third-party subpoena about the lawyer’s existing client or former client creates a conflict of interest under Rules 1.7 or 1.9. 

Recent News

D.C. Court of Appeals

August 19, 2024

Court of Appeals Specifies When a Flat Fee Is Earned

In re Alexei, decided August 1, 2024, by the D.C. Court of Appeals, holds that absent an agreement specifying to the contrary, an attorney earns a flat-fee payment only upon completion of all enlisted services. The court announced its interpretation of Rule 1.15 of the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct for the first time, clarifying an issue previously addressed in In re Mance. The opinion, issued less than three months after oral argument, is here.

Meti Abebe

August 13, 2024

Superior Court Welcomes Two New Magistrate Judges

By John Murph

Chief Judge Anita Josey-Herring swore in two new magistrate judges, Meti Abebe and David Richter, on August 12 inside her chambers at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

Skyline