• Print Page

Legal Ethics Committee Adopts New Opinions

February 24, 2021

The D.C. Bar Legal Ethics Committee has issued Opinion 380 (Conflict of Interest Issues Related to Witnesses), which examines certain recurring conflict of interest scenarios related to witnesses who are current or former clients, including issuing subpoenas, advising on Fifth Amendment rights, and cross-examination. The opinion also discusses thrust-upon conflicts involving unforeseen witnesses and the imputation of conflicts across a firm. Finally, the opinion offers suggestions for anticipating, identifying, preventing, and resolving conflicts related to witnesses. 

The committee has also issued Legal Ethics Opinion 381 (Responding to Third-Party Subpoena), addressing the circumstances under which a lawyer’s representation of a prospective client in responding to a third-party subpoena about the lawyer’s existing client or former client creates a conflict of interest under Rules 1.7 or 1.9. 

Recent News

D.C. Superior Court Chief Judge Milton C. Lee Jr.

April 30, 2025

AI and the Courts: Conference Highlights Dangers of New Tech

By Jeremy Conrad

Discussions at the 2025 Judicial & Bar Conference on April 25 reflected on the impact of technological changes on the legal profession, but several panelists also drew attention to the potential harm of artificial intelligence on the orderly administration of justice.

D.C. Superior Court

April 30, 2025

D.C. Courts Release 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

Chief Judge Anna Blackburne-Rigsby of the D.C. Court of Appeals and Chief Judge Milton C. Lee, Jr., of the D.C. Superior Court have released the 14th annual Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll, recognizing the contributions of those D.C. Bar members and other lawyers authorized to perform pro bono legal work in the District of Columbia who completed 50 hours or more of pro bono service during the prior calendar year.

Skyline