• You are here:
  • News & Events
  • News
  • D.C. Courts Advisory Committee Addresses Judicial Participation in Fundraising Activities
  • Print Page

D.C. Courts Advisory Committee Addresses Judicial Participation in Fundraising Activities

April 05, 2022

On March 28 the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct of the District of Columbia Courts issued Advisory Opinion No. 15 on use of a judge’s name on the letterhead of organizations engaged in fundraising appeals or membership solicitation, as well as judicial involvement in applications for grants. The opinion superseded Advisory Opinion No. 8, issued in 2000, addressing the same issues.

Rule 3.7(A)(2) of the Code of Judicial Conduct restricts a judge’s solicitation of contributions to members of the judge’s family or judges over whom the judge does not exercise supervisory or appellate authority. Similarly, Rule 3.7(A)(3) permits a judge to solicit membership for an organization even though membership dues or fees may be used to support the group’s objectives, provided that it is concerned with the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice.

Read the opinion in full here.

Recent News

Lloyd Liu

January 28, 2026

CJDT Announces Appointment of Commissioner Lloyd Liu

The District of Columbia Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure (CJDT) has announced the appointment of its newest commissioner, Lloyd Liu, who replaced Judge Diane M. Brenneman effective January 2, 2026.

D.C. Superior Court

January 27, 2026

Comment on Fitness of Superior Court Judges Di Toro, Williams, and Knowles

The D.C. Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure (CJDT) invites comments on the qualifications and fitness of D.C. Superior Court Associate Judges Jennifer A. Di Toro and Yvonne M. Williams, who are seeking reappointment upon the expiration of their current terms, both ending on August 2, 2026.

D.C. Bar

January 23, 2026

Bar Seeks Candidates for Committee and Board Vacancies

The D.C. Bar Board of Governors is seeking candidates for appointment this spring to the Attorney/Client Arbitration Board (ACAB), Clients’ Security Fund, Legal Ethics Committee (LEC), Rules of Professional Conduct Review Committee, and Board on Professional Responsibility (BPR) of the D.C. Court of Appeals.

Skyline