- For the Public
- For Lawyers
- Board on Professional Responsibility
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel
- Disciplinary Decisions
-
Attorney Discipline News
- Administrative Order 2020-8: Live Streams of Hearing Committee Proceedings
- Amendments to the Rules of the Board on Professional Responsibility
- Amendment to Reinstatement Questionnaire
- Administrative Order 2023-1: Return to In-Person Proceedings
- The Court of Appeals Makes Appointments to the Board on Professional Responsibility
- Amendments to the Rules of the Board on Professional Responsibility
Search Disciplinary Decisions by
Attorney Name
Search Disciplinary Decisions by
Date Range
Search Disciplinary Decisions by
Keyword
Kristopher Twomey
Docket No. 23-BD-013
Decisions
Hearing Committee Report (September 16, 2024)
Summary: Not yet available.
DCCA Opinion (August 29, 2024)
Summary: Not yet available.
DCCA Order (July 17, 2024)
Summary: In re Kristopher E. Twomey. Bar No. 979338. July 17, 2024. Twomey was suspended on an interim basis pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9(g), pending final action on the Board on Professional Responsibility’s May 31, 2024, recommendation of a two-year suspension.
Board Report and Orders (May 31, 2024)
Summary: In re Kristopher E. Twomey. Bar No. 979338. May 31, 2024. The Board on Professional Responsibility recommended that the D.C. Court of Appeals suspend Twomey for two years. While retained to represent two telecommunications companies seeking regulatory approvals that would entitle them to federal funds for providing high-speed internet service in rural areas under the Federal Communications Commission’s Rural Digital Opportunity Fund, Twomey violated Rules 1.3(c) (reasonable promptness), 1.4(a) (communication), 1.4(b) (failure to explain matter), 4.1(a) (false statement to third person), and 8.4(c) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation). Specifically, Twomey knew that one state would decline jurisdiction, but he failed to make good-faith efforts to obtain a formal declination in time to meet the deadline. Twomey also failed to tell both clients that he was not on track to timely obtain Eligible Telecommunication Carrier (ETC) status in four of the five states, which deprived them of the opportunity to reassign the state applications to other counsel and maintain their ability to seek a deadline waiver, if necessary. Also, Twomey gave affirmatively false assurances to his clients regarding the status of the ETC applications in those four states.
Hearing Committee Report (April 5, 2024)
Summary: Not yet available.
Charging Documents
Answer (March 15, 2023)
Specification of Charges (February 22, 2023)
To search for additional disciplinary cases involving this attorney, click here
- For the Public
- For Lawyers
- Board on Professional Responsibility
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel
- Disciplinary Decisions
-
Attorney Discipline News
- Administrative Order 2020-8: Live Streams of Hearing Committee Proceedings
- Amendments to the Rules of the Board on Professional Responsibility
- Amendment to Reinstatement Questionnaire
- Administrative Order 2023-1: Return to In-Person Proceedings
- The Court of Appeals Makes Appointments to the Board on Professional Responsibility
- Amendments to the Rules of the Board on Professional Responsibility
- Board on Professional Responsibility
- 430 E Street NW
- Suite 138
- Washington, DC 20001
- Phone: 202-638-4290
- Fax:
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- 515 5th Street, NW
- Building A, Suite 117, Washington, DC 20001
- Phone: 202-638-1501
- Fax: 202-638-0862