Antoine Mann

DCCA Order (September 29, 2005)

Summary: In a reciprocal matter from Maryland, the D.C. Court of Appeals imposed identical reciprocal discipline and indefinitely suspended Mann. Mann may apply for reinstatement after he is reinstated in Maryland or after five years, whichever occurs first. Mann was indefinitely suspended in Maryland based on a joint petition by consent as a result of eight complaints charging him with serious violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, including fraud, lying under oath, and other criminal conduct.

Board Report and Orders (July 18, 2005)

Summary: In a reciprocal matter from Maryland, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that the D.C. Court of Appeals impose identical reciprocal discipline and indefinitely suspend Mann. The Court of Appeals of Maryland indefinitely suspended Mann by consent owing to his “psychological and/or psychotic problems that cannot be diagnosed at this time due to [his] abuse of alcohol.” In his consent Mann acknowledged that if a hearing were to be held, sufficient evidence could be produced to sustain the allegations of misconduct in eight separate complaints over a four-year period. Mann also consented to pay $6,474.85 to reimburse the Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission for costs incurred in its investigation.