- For the Public
- For Lawyers
- Board on Professional Responsibility
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel
- Disciplinary Decisions
-
Attorney Discipline News
- Administrative Order 2020-8: Live Streams of Hearing Committee Proceedings
- Administrative Order 2020-7: In-Person Proceedings are Postponed Until Further Notice, Oral Arguments and Hearings to be Held by Zoom Videoconference
- 2019-20 Annual Report of the Board on Professional Responsibility
- Hearing Committee Schedule and Audio Streaming Link
- Amendments to the Rules of the Board on Professional Responsibility
- Amendment to Reinstatement Questionnaire
- Administrative Order 2023-1: Return to In-Person Proceedings
- The Court of Appeals Makes Appointments to the Board on Professional Responsibility
Search Disciplinary Decisions by
Attorney Name
Search Disciplinary Decisions by
Date Range
Search Disciplinary Decisions by
Keyword
Harry Tun
Docket No. 19-BD-019
Decisions
DCCA Opinion (December 22, 2022)
Summary: In re Harry Tun. Bar No. 416262. December 22, 2022. The D.C. Court of Appeals disbarred Tun for his perjurious and dishonest failure to disclose professional discipline on six attorney renewal applications he filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. The disbarment is based on the underlying misconduct and Tun’s continuing and intentional dishonesty about his own discipline. Tun violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-303.3(a)(1) (knowingly making a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal), 19-308.4(b) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the attorney’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer), 19-308.4(c) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty), and 19-308.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice).
Board Report and Orders (February 2, 2022)
Summary: In re Harry Tun. Bar No. 416262. February 2, 2022. The Board on Professional Responsibility recommended that the D.C. Court of Appeals disbar Tun for his perjurious and dishonest failure to disclose professional discipline on six attorney renewal applications he filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. The board based the disbarment on the underlying misconduct and Tun’s continuing and intentional dishonesty about his own discipline. Tun violated Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 19-303.3(a)(1) (knowingly making a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal); 19-308.4(b) (committing perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1621 and Maryland Code, Criminal Law, § 9-101, a criminal act that reflects adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness, and fitness as a lawyer); 19-308.4(c) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty); and 19-308.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice).
Hearing Committee Report (April 15, 2021)
Summary: Not yet available.
To search for additional disciplinary cases involving this attorney, click here
- For the Public
- For Lawyers
- Board on Professional Responsibility
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel
- Disciplinary Decisions
-
Attorney Discipline News
- Administrative Order 2020-8: Live Streams of Hearing Committee Proceedings
- Administrative Order 2020-7: In-Person Proceedings are Postponed Until Further Notice, Oral Arguments and Hearings to be Held by Zoom Videoconference
- 2019-20 Annual Report of the Board on Professional Responsibility
- Hearing Committee Schedule and Audio Streaming Link
- Amendments to the Rules of the Board on Professional Responsibility
- Amendment to Reinstatement Questionnaire
- Administrative Order 2023-1: Return to In-Person Proceedings
- The Court of Appeals Makes Appointments to the Board on Professional Responsibility
- Board on Professional Responsibility
- 430 E Street NW
- Suite 138
- Washington, DC 20001
- Phone: 202-638-4290
- Fax:
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- 515 5th Street, NW
- Building A, Suite 117, Washington, DC 20001
- Phone: 202-638-1501
- Fax: 202-638-0862