William Rogers

DCCA Opinion (April 2, 2015)

Summary: The D.C. Court of Appeals suspended Rogers for 90 days with fitness. Rogers violated D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct 4.2(a) (contact with a represented party) and 8.4(c) (dishonesty) when he met with an elderly woman, without the consent of her counsel, and when he prepared testamentary documents for her that benefited his client. Rules 4.2(a) and 8.4(c).

DCCA Order (March 25, 2014)

Summary: Rogers was suspended on an interim basis pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9(g), pending final action on the Board on Professional Responsibility’s December 31, 2013, recommendation of a 90 day suspension with fitness.

Board Report and Orders (December 31, 2013)

Summary: The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that the D.C. Court of Appeals suspend Rogers for 90 days with fitness. Rogers violated Rules 4.2(a) (contact with a represented party) and 8.4(c) (dishonesty) when he met with an elderly woman without the consent of her counsel and when he prepared testamentary documents for her that benefited his client. Rules 4.2(a) and 8.4(c).

Hearing Committee Report (October 29, 2013)

Summary: Not yet available.