• You are here:
  • News & Events
  • News
  • Court of Appeals Extends Comment Period for Proposed Rules Amendments
  • Print Page

Court of Appeals Extends Comment Period for Proposed Rules Amendments

December 20, 2024

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals is seeking comment on amendments  to D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (Competence), 1.6 (Confidentiality of Information), 3.8 (Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor), 4.4 (Respect for Rights of Third Persons), and 5.3 (Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants).

Comments must be submitted by January 31, either electronically to [email protected] or by mail to Clerk, D.C. Court of Appeals, 430 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001.

Proposed by the D.C. Bar in April 2020, the amendments seek to address the continuing responsibility of a lawyer to keep abreast of changes in technology (Rule 1.1); a lawyer's duty to exercise reasonable care to prevent unauthorized access to electronic information, and the reasonableness of security measures to be taken by a lawyer when using and storing electronic communications (Rule 1.6); and a lawyer’s obligations after receiving inadvertently sent information or metadata (Rule 4.4).

Amendments to Rule 3.8 will make the Rule consistent with the Court of Appeals’ holding in In re Kline and include new Rules 3.8(h), (i), and (j) and Comments [4]–[7] to address duties of prosecutors to disclose certain post-conviction exculpatory information. Proposed changes to Rule 5.3 will address ethical obligations when lawyers “outsource” legal work or use “outside” lawyers, and where the client rather than the lawyer is directing the outsourcing.

The court invites comment on the Bar’s recommendations, as well as to issues related to Rule 3.8 not considered by the Bar’s Rules of Professional Conduct Review Committee.

Recent News

D.C. Bar

January 29, 2025

Bar Seeks Candidates for Committee and Board Vacancies

The D.C. Bar Board of Governors is seeking candidates for appointment this spring to the Attorney/Client Arbitration Board (ACAB), Clients’ Security Fund, Legal Ethics Committee, Rules of Professional Conduct Review Committee, and Board on Professional Responsibility (BPR) of the D.C. Court of Appeals.

D.C. Superior Court

January 13, 2025

Comment on Fitness of 11 Applicants for Superior Court Vacancies

On January 8 the District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission announced that there are 11 applicants for the judicial vacancies on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia created by the retirement of Judges Anthony C. Epstein and Alfred S. Irving Jr. The commission will submit the names of three applicants to the president of the United States for his consideration to nominate and appoint a judge for each vacancy.

Skyline